Grafana vs Kibana

Multi-source metrics dashboarding versus Elasticsearch-centric log analytics.

Overview

What is being compared

Grafana is an open-source visualization platform that builds dashboards on top of many data sources. Kibana is the visualization layer of the Elastic Stack, built mainly to query Elasticsearch.

  • Data sources — Dozens: Prometheus, Loki, InfluxDB, CloudWatch, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL — Primarily Elasticsearch indices
  • Place in a stack — Standalone, connects to sources — Part of the Elastic Stack
  • Best at — Metrics dashboards — Full-text log search and analytics
  • Role — Dashboard standard for metrics — Search and analytics on Elasticsearch

How each one gets its data

Grafana stores nothing itself: it queries Prometheus, Loki, CloudWatch and the rest where the data already lives. Kibana reads Elasticsearch, which Beats or Logstash fill, and those indices need managing too.

What happens to a log index in Elasticsearch

Behind Kibana, every log index needs a lifecycle, or indices grow without bound and the disk fills. An ILM policy rolls the write index over and deletes old indices once they pass the retention window.

> [!TIP] Grafana's many sources next to Kibana on Elasticsearch, an incident traced from a metric spike to its logs in Explore and in Discover, and the questions that pick one, step by step in Visual Explanation below.

Sign up free to read the full topic

More Comparisons topics

Start free on Cariara · Coding problems · System design studio